JADE HELM & WHY Russian Navy Armada is off Texas Coast for “Liberation Exercise”

JADE HELM & WHY Russian Navy Armada is Ordered To Coast Of Texas For “Liberation Exercise”…
The report mentions “Weather warfare” applied onto Texas; Texas repatriation of its $1 billion physical GOLD from the NY Federal Reserve Bank; the False Flag shootings; the new “Law of War” wich states that “Journalists” may be classified as “Biligerant Journalists = Enemy”…
The foremost reason is Texas wish to quit the United states and claim its independence.
– Texas, if it were a country, would be the 14th Largest World Economy.


Control the environment and you control human behavior and, ultimately, the destiny of humanity Virtual reality mediated social behavior, designed to appeal to a generation acclimated to the internet and a diverse world of computer generation games and entertainment, may serve as the next step in a larger and more complex control paradigm. Earlier this week, Facebook dropped $2 billion to buy the virtual reality company Oculus Rift, described by Dave Thier of Forbes as “a bizarre, maddening and beguiling beast” that will reshape “conference calls, virtual tourism, goggle-sized home theaters and more.” The strap-on technology is, as well, Thier adds, “scary.” Considering the murky history of Facebook, the adjective is appropriate. Facebook received start-up funding from Accel Parnters, a venture capital firm with deep connections to In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s technology investment outfit. It is also connected to the Defense Department and its Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development. DARPA was instrumental in building the original internet. Later, when DARPA’s Information Awareness Office, a surveillance technology project, was exposed folks began to ask questions. Congress promised to defund the project and it was quietly rolled into the NSA. High technology projects with even thin connections to the NSA and the CIA should be suspect. Moreover, Facebook boss, Mark Zuckerberg, has publicly forged a connection between Facebook and the surveillance state when he declared in 2010 the age of privcy is over. He also said sharing information with “people,” and, obviously, the state, with its ubiquitous surveillance and control grid, and large corporations is now a “social norm.” “I think Facebook may be testing the waters for something even more science fiction than VR games here. I think they believe they can someday t                                                                              In Ernest Cline's novel Ready Player One computers and virtual reality have taken over and control social life.

In Ernest Cline’s novel Ready Player One, computers and virtual reality control social life.

Tassi mentions two science fiction books that get right to the crux of what is likely to emerge from a CIA and NSA spawned social network moving into the virtual realm: Ready Player One by Ernest Cline and Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. Both novels portray a horrific world where computers and virtual reality have not only taken over and control social life, but become society. “If Mark Zuckerberg is telling me I can talk to virtual teachers and doctors and have adventures and experiences with my friends through his vision of the Oculus, I have to imagine that in the back of his mind, he has something like a true VR social network in mind,” writes Tassi. “Maybe a ‘social network’ is even too restrictive a term. Maybe it will someday just be an entirely digital world.” If allowed to develop under the guiding hand of the CIA and the NSA, virtual reality will eventually become the perfect mechanism for controlling humanity. “Sometime in the 2020s, reality simulations will become so high-resolution and immersive that they’llstart to get indistinguishable from the real thing,” writes the Lifeboat Foundation. “Simulations will become the preferred environments for work and play.” “In the long run, VR could unlock limitless possibilities for human creativity,” argues Humanity Plus, a transhumanist organization. “We could construct artificial experiential worlds, in which the laws of physics can be suspended, that would appear as real as physical reality to participants.” Control the environment and you control human behavior and, ultimately, the direction and destiny of humanity. According to investigative author Daniel Estulin, the global elite plan to use transhumanism to create a master race destined to reach the stars after destroying the rest of humanity and the planet. “Globalists plan to seize all of the planet’s assets, natural and otherwise,” writes Rady Ananda in a review of Estulin’s book, TransEvolution: The Coming Age of Human Deconstruction. Virtual reality mediated social behavior, designed to appeal to a generation acclimated to the internet and a diverse world of computer generated games and entertainment, may serve as the next step in a larger and more complex control paradigm. Nurtured and shepherded by the likes of Google, Facebook, and other large corporations owned by the global elite under the purview of a supranational intelligence monolith, the future appears dim.

Vision Tracking Company Wants Your Eyes To Be Next PS4 Controller

Eye tracking device would translate eyeball motions into on-screen movement

Many are aware of the mountain of Orwellian features inherent in Microsoft’s latest gaming console, Xbox One, but competitor Sony may soon take the cake when it comes to creepy, invasive Big Brother-style add-ons.

Sony’s Magic Lab research department has been working with SensoMotoric Instruments (SMI), a world leader in “eye & gaze tracking systems,” to develop an attachment that will allow gamers to control cameras, characters and events on screen sans a controller. All that will be required is your eyes.

A prototype demonstration shows users would set the device on a table in front of a monitor about 50 to 75 centimeters from the eyes. The device’s cameras would then track eye motions and translate that data into actual movements on screen.

The technology is still far from hitting store shelves, and may fail to materialize, but gamers and reviewers are already smitten with the new eyeball tracker.

A writer for Wired, who tested a prototype at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco last week, commented on “how awesome it is to use.”

Digital Trends also hopes SMI’s eye tracker “may just be part of the future of gaming,” marveling at how “the effects are amazing.”

Eye tracking technology is indeed nothing new, however, SMI’s extensive background in the field should send up red flags for gamers concerned with privacy.

This is because SMI isn’t just barely wading into the eye-tracking trend. This is their realm, and for decades they’ve been working to perfect various innovations that have all sorts of creepy applications.

Eye tracking prototype demo used on InFAMOUS: Second Son. / Screen capture via Verge.com

The company’s bread and butter is primarily designing eye tracking goggles for market, psychologyand human research. A “Neuroheadset” can also accompany the eye tracking glasses to combine and record brain response data.

SMI also recently announced they were working in conjunction with Utah-based “deception detection company” Conversus to develop eye tracking technology “for reliable lie detection.”

In other words, they’re not noobs when it comes to eye surveillance tech, which they refer to as “solutions.”

There’s also the fact that research has led to successful interpretation of human emotions, as well as the ability to diagnose a wide range of health issues, simply by studying the retina, eye gaze patterns and pupil size variation, adding a whole other marketable dimension to possibly be exploited.

Given Microsoft has already submitted a patent for its new Xbox system to be able to analyze gamers’ emotions, or levels of engagement or enjoyment, and reward them based on whether or not they’re actually viewing ads, it’s not too far-fetched to assume PS4 is looking to integrate some of these same features.

Recently we also learned about a Swiss technology institute’s development of in-vehicle cameras that would detect a wide range of emotions, the purported goal being to combat road rage before it starts by sensing whenever a person’s facial expressions are perceived as “anger” or “disgust.”

It should be noted that Sony was not revealed to be a PRISM participant via NSA contractor Edward Snowden’s leaks, but the company’s partnership with NASA to bring about their new virtual reality headset, Project Morpheus, underscores their fondness of establishing relationships with government entities.

As privacy becomes a thing of the past, consider in George Orwell’s novel 1984 that all his protagonist Winston wanted to do was to get away from ubiquitous cameras and microphones that would peer into every private moment of his life.

Related Articles


Yes, There Are Paid Government Trolls On Social Media, Blogs, Forums And Websites

American Dream
February 27, 2014

Do you want solid proof that paid government shills are targeting websites, blogs, forums and social media accounts?  For years, many have suspected that government trolls have been systematically causing havoc all over the Internet, but proving it has been difficult.

Image: Keyboard (Wikimedia Commons).

But now thanks to documents leaked by Edward Snowden and revealed by Glenn Greenwald, we finally have hard evidence that western governments have been doing this.  As you will see below, a UK intelligence outfit known as the Government Communications Headquarters, through a previously secret unit known as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group, has been systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse”.  This should be deeply disturbing to anyone that values free speech on the Internet.

It isn’t just that the British government is trying to influence what people are thinking.  The reality is that this is far bigger than a mere propaganda campaign.  As Greenwald recently noted on his new website, the “integrity of the Internet itself” is at stake…

By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: themonitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.

So what techniques are the British using to control and manipulate discourse on the Internet?  According to Greenwald, the documents that Snowden has uncovered show that they are willing to sink to despicable lows in order to get the results that they desire…

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques tomanipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.

The following is a list of Internet infiltration techniques that were listed on one particular slide that Snowden leaked…

Infiltration Operation

Ruse Operation

Set Piece Operation

False Flag Operation

False Rescue Operation

Disruption Operation

Sting Operation

You can check out this slide for yourself right here.

There is also evidence that the Canadian government has been involved in this sort of thing as well.  The following comes from Natural News

You’ve probably run into them before — those seemingly random antagonizers who always end up diverting the conversation in an online chat room or article comment section away from the issue at hand, and towards a much different agenda. Hot-button issues like illegal immigration, the two-party political system, the “war on terror” and even alternative medicine are among the most common targets of such attackers, known as internet “trolls” or “shills,” who in many cases are nothing more than paid lackeys hired by the federal government and other international organizations to sway and ultimately control public opinion.

Several years ago, Canada’s CTV News aired a short segment about how its own government had been exposed for hiring secret agents to monitor social media and track online conversations, as well as the activities of certain dissenting individuals. This report, which in obvious whitewashing language referred to such activities as the government simply “weighing in and correcting” allegedly false information posted online, basically admitted that the Canadian government had assumed the role of secret online police.

You can see a video news report about this activity up in Canada right here.

Are you disturbed yet?

You should be.

So what kind of people are the governments of the western world targeting online?

Well, when it comes to the U.S. government, all you have to do is to look at their official documents to see who they consider the “problems” to be.  For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“.

Sadly, the reality of the matter is that the days of the free and open Internet are numbered.  The governments of the world are increasing their control over the Internet with each passing day, and eventually a time will likely come when we will not be able to communicate openly like this any longer.

Things have gotten so bad in the U.S. already that even Google is spooked

A recent court decision that endorsed a broad view of the Federal Communications Commission’s authority over the Internet has Google and other Web companies nervous.

In closed-door meetings with regulators and Capitol Hill staff, Google’s lawyers have said they’re worried how the FCC may use its newfound powers, according to multiple people familiar with the meetings.

The extent of the FCC’s authority over Google and other Web services remains unclear, and the current FCC has given no indication that it is interested in pushing aggressive new regulations. But the possibility that the commission could begin telling Google how to organize its search results or handle its users’ data is enough to spook the company’s army of Washington lobbyists.

And this is just the beginning.

If you think that the control freaks that are running things now are bad, just wait until you see the next generation of control freaks.

For example, there is one prominent student writer at Harvard that apparently believes that free speech at her university should be abolished and that any professor that does not advocate for her politically-correct version of “justice” should be fired

A student writer at Harvard University is raising eyebrows after publishing her belief that free speech on campus should be abolished and professors with opposing views be fired.

Sandra Korn, a senior who writes a column for the Harvard Crimson newspaper, thinks radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy, and the First Amendment only hinders colleges from brainwashing students with her viewpoint.

“Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice,” states the subtitle of her Feb. 18 column, in which she insists Harvard stop guaranteeing students and professors the right to hold controversial views and conduct research putting liberalism in a negative light.

“If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals?” Korn asks.

This is what control freaks always want.

They always want to shut down those that are presenting opposing views.

They don’t believe in free speech and a “marketplace of ideas”.  Rather, they believe in shoving what they believe down the rest of our throats.

And now we have solid proof that the governments of the western world are paying people to manipulate discourse on social media, blogs, forums and websites.

So will there be great outrage over this, or will the apathetic public just roll over and ignore this like they have so many other times the past few years?